Russell Tribunal: A source for justice and jurisprudence in a lawless nation.

Watching the news and listening to the shills perpetuate the propaganda I have come to the conclusion that we humans are in for a very bumpy ride unless we take action to restore sanity to our nation via the rule of law.

Here is a great place to start:  "The Russell Tribunal" it is based on the rule of law and is the voice of the people not government entities under the control and influence of special interest.  If Cynthia McKinney is involved I'm sure it has some credibility to getting to the facts.  Here is a brief summary from the Tribunals website:

The Russell Tribunal has no legal status but acts as a court of the people, a Tribunal of conscience, faced with injustices and violations of international law, that are not dealt with by existing international jurisdictions, or that are recognised but continue with complete impunity due to the lack of political will of the international community.

We do not have many options to oppose the governing body since violence is really not an option to change the current system.  Have you watched the Boston takeover by every government organization paid for by our tax dollars.  They have the latest weaponry and are not afraid to use it on a somewhat defenseless public.  So our only recourse is to document and state the infractions of the parties involved in criminal activities which hold the masses in a suppressed state of servitude.  Currently the tribunal is focusing on the Palestine issue but it could be so many others.

"By all accounts, law enforcement and military personnel have classified  Boston and surrounding towns a war-zone, especially after a gunfight yesterday evening that left one of the Boston Marathon Bombers dead and the other still at large. In a video of the early morning engagement, rapid gunfire and explosive detonations, believed to be more ‘pressure cooker’ bombs, can be heard as police and residents scrambled.
This has led to shelter-in-place orders being issued by officials, a widespread militarization of nearly a hundred square miles surrounding Boston, and deserted streets throughout the city.
Section 1031 of the controversial National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 effectively declares the United States a battlefield, suspends the U.S. Constitution and essentially allows the President, through the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. military, to deploy assets in this war zone as he sees fit:"

Link to some new weaponry we have paid for with our taxes: Link



Take a look at this write-up from the Vietnam War:

Conclusions and Verdicts of the Tribunal

The Tribunal stated that its conclusions were as follows:

1. Has the Government of the United States committed acts of aggression against Vietnam under the terms of international law?
   Yes (unanimously).
2. Has there been, and if so, on what scale, bombardment of purely civilian targets, for example, hospitals, schools, medical establishments, dams, etc?
   Yes (unanimously).

   We find the government and armed forces of the United States are guilty of the deliberate, systematic and large-scale bombardment of civilian targets, including civilian populations, dwellings, villages, dams, dikes, medical establishments, leper colonies, schools, churches, pagodas, historical and cultural monuments. We also find unanimously, with one abstention, that the government of the United States of America is guilty of repeated violations of the sovereignty, neutrality and territorial integrity of Cambodia, that it is guilty of attacks against the civilian population of a certain number of Cambodian towns and villages.

3. Have the governments of Australia, New Zealand and South Korea been accomplices of the United States in the aggression against Vietnam in violation of international law?
   Yes (unanimously).

   The question also arises as to whether or not the governments of Thailand and other countries have become accomplices to acts of aggression or other crimes against Vietnam and its populations. We have not been able to study this question during the present session. We intend to examine at the next session legal aspects of the problem and to seek proofs of any incriminating facts.

4. Is the Government of Thailand guilty of complicity in the aggression committed by the United States Government against Vietnam?
   Yes (unanimously).
5. Is the Government of the Philippines guilty of complicity in the aggression committed by the United States Government against Vietnam?
   Yes (unanimously).
6. Is the Government of Japan guilty of complicity in the aggression committed by the United States Government against Vietnam?
   Yes, (by 8 Votes to 3).

   The three Tribunal members who voted against agree that the Japanese Government gives considerable aid to the Government of the United States, but do not agree on its complicity in the crime of aggression.

7. Has the United States Government committed aggression against the people of Laos, according to the definition provided by international law?
   Yes (unanimously).
8. Have the armed forces of the United States used or experimented with weapons prohibited by the laws of war?
   Yes (unanimously).
9. Have prisoners of war captured by the armed forces of the United States been subjected to treatment prohibited by the laws of war?
   Yes (unanimously).
10. Have the armed forces of the United States subjected the civilian population to inhuman treatment prohibited by international law?
    Yes (unanimously).
11. Is the United States Government guilty of genocide against the people of Vietnam?
    Yes (unanimously).

Prompted in part by the My Lai massacre, in 1969 the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation organized Citizens Commissions of Inquiry (CCI) to hold hearings intended to document testimony of war crimes in Indochina. These hearings were held in several American cities, and would eventually form the foundation of two national investigations: the National Veterans Inquiry sponsored by the CCI, and the Winter Soldier Investigation sponsored by the Vietnam Veterans Against the War.

Source

Could we support a tribunal for many of the Banker Wars currently being fought by our country in the Middle East?

If the USA and the populace doesn't want to be the spearhead for supporting this organization I propose another country take the helm.

Remember silence is consent: Video

Interview with Cynthia McKinney