Monday, March 27, 2023

The state of World Affairs according to Google's AI - Bard 2023

The state of world affairs in 2023 is a complex and ever-changing one. There are many challenges that the world is facing, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the climate crisis, and the war in Ukraine. However, there are also many opportunities for progress, such as the rise of new technologies and the growing movement for sustainability.

Here are some of the key issues that are shaping the world in 2023:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing, and new variants are emerging. The pandemic has had a significant impact on the global economy and has led to a rise in poverty and inequality.
  • The climate crisis is worsening, and extreme weather events are becoming more frequent. The climate crisis is a major threat to global security and stability.
  • The war in Ukraine is a major humanitarian crisis. The war has caused millions of people to flee their homes and has led to widespread destruction.
  • The rise of new technologies is creating new opportunities and challenges. New technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain have the potential to transform many aspects of our lives.
  • The growing movement for sustainability is driving change in many areas. The movement for sustainability is demanding that businesses and governments take action to protect the environment.

These are just some of the key issues that are shaping the world in 2023. The world is facing many challenges, but there are also many opportunities for progress. It is important to stay informed about the latest developments and to work together to find solutions to the challenges that we face.

Sunday, March 26, 2023

Mother Nature serves up some Shock and Awe like it means business.

 This is what shock and awe looks like in the U.S. Tornadoes

ROLLING FORK, Miss. – Severe storms rumbled across parts of the South on Sunday, two days after violent tornadoes smashed through the Mississippi Delta region – one of the country's poorest areas – gutting rural towns and leaving more than two dozen people dead.

Search and rescue teams continued to dig through the rubble Sunday. At least 25 people died in a twister that stayed on the ground in Mississippi for more than an hour Friday night. Houses were torn from foundations, trees were stripped of branches, cars were flipped like toys, entire blocks were wiped out. 

Rolling Fork, about 60 miles northwest of Jackson, suffered such damage that Mayor Eldridge Walker declared bluntly to CNN, "My city is gone." 

DEADLY STORMS: Tornadoes rip through Mississippi

Developments:

►Pope Francis offered a special prayer Sunday for the people of Mississippi “hit by a devastating tornado” during his weekly noon blessing in Vatican City.

►President Joe Biden early Sunday issued an emergency declaration for Mississippi, making federal funding available to Carroll, Humphreys, Monroe and Sharkey counties, the areas hardest hit Friday night. Biden called the damage "heartbreaking."

►Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves issued a state of emergency and vowed to help rebuild.

►The Federal Emergency Management Agency said 2,000 homes in Mississippi were damaged or destroyed. 

Yes, but Ukraine is the priority of the ruling class and we should now send more money, equipment, and troops to fight in this undeclared war that was caused by some Zealots in power.  Humanity and the U.S. citizen will suffer in the long run.  








Remember the Iraq War which was started on False pretenses? Now we have Ukraine and possibly other WARs forthcoming..

 



"The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history." -George Orwell



Watch 'The War You Don't See: Why Propaganda Hides the True Face of War' here:    • The War You Don't...   Saddam Hussein's arsenal of "weapons of mass destruction" was George W. Bush's main justification for waging war against Iraq in 2003. After the invasion of the country, American leaders recognized that they had been mistaken, and that the Baghdad tyrant did not possess such a capability. Bush claimed it was an error and defended his good faith, denouncing the negligence of his secret services. But the brutal truth lies elsewhere: The war in Iraq was based on lies. It was the poisoned fruit of an unprecedented manipulation of the American public, the international press, and politicians around the world. This documentary reveals the deception, interpreted by those who imagined it, and unveils how America committed to a conflict that caused hundreds of thousands of casualties and cost some 3000 billion dollars. ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Subscribe ENDEVR for free: https://bit.ly/3e9YRRG Facebook: https://bit.ly/2QfRxbG Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/endevrdocs/




Did America rush into a war in Iraq for which it was unprepared? In this 2003 documentary, FRONTLINE examines why the U.S. went to war in Iraq, what went wrong in the planning for the postwar occupation, and what was at stake for both the U.S. and for Iraqis.

The United States invaded Iraq in 2003, claiming that the Iraqi government was developing weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and was a threat to the United States. The invasion was widely condemned by the international community, and it has been the subject of much debate and controversy ever since.

There are a number of reasons why the United States went to war with Iraq. Some of the most commonly cited reasons include:

  • The Bush administration believed that Iraq was developing WMD. The administration claimed that Iraq had anthrax, VX nerve gas, and other WMD, and that it was working to develop nuclear weapons. However, these claims were later found to be false.
  • The Bush administration believed that Iraq was a threat to the United States. The administration claimed that Iraq was supporting terrorism and that it was a threat to the stability of the Middle East. However, there is no evidence to support these claims.
  • The Bush administration wanted to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Saddam Hussein was a dictator who had committed human rights abuses against his own people. The Bush administration believed that removing Saddam from power would make the world a better place.

The invasion of Iraq was a major turning point in American foreign policy. It led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people, and it destabilized the Middle East. The invasion has also been a major financial burden for the United States.

The invasion of Iraq was a controversial decision, and it is still debated today. There are many people who believe that the invasion was a mistake, and that it has done more harm than good. However, there are also many people who believe that the invasion was necessary to remove Saddam Hussein from power and to make the world a safer place. Invasion of Libya:

The invasion of Libya by the US in 2011 was not legal. The UN Security Council passed a resolution authorizing a no-fly zone over Libya, but did not authorize an invasion. The US and its allies invaded Libya without UN authorization, which is a violation of international law.

The US and its allies argued that the invasion was justified under the principle of humanitarian intervention. However, the UN Security Council did not authorize the invasion for this purpose. The invasion was also criticized for being based on false intelligence about the presence of WMDs in Libya.

The invasion of Libya has had a number of negative consequences. It has destabilized the country and led to the deaths of thousands of people. It has also made it more difficult for the UN to authorize future humanitarian interventions.

Saturday, March 25, 2023

U.S. Senate rescinds War Powers Act. Votes for many more years of unjust WAR's




I find it hard to believe that 100 U.S. Senators have the power to continue waging wars all over the world based on lies and deception for invading Iraq. This is amazing information and should be an education to all humanity. For a small group of people to have such power over billions of lives is so contrary to democratic principles espoused by our governments and media. Take heed humanity, you're in for a very bumpy ride regarding any peaceful resolution to the situation at hand in Ukraine and elsewhere. In addition, we have 5 cowardly Senators that abstained or did not vote for such a crucial bill. This Bill was initiated in February 2023. For those senate members that attended and voted "YEA" on this bill you should be enshrined in the book of true leadership and proclaimed a valid member of the human race. Your actions speak louder than the words of our mainstream media.

So, there you have it humanity as listed below for all to see and research at your leisure. We are doomed by a handful of zealots and puppets of the ruling class. May we all pray and maintain faith that the greater power of the universe has taken note and will bring forth true justice to our home on earth.

Purpose: S.Amdt.2 — 118th Congress (2023-2024)All Information (Except Text)


118th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 316


To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.


IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 9, 2023

Mr. Kaine (for himself, Mr. Young, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Lee, Mr. Coons, Mr. Paul, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Daines, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Marshall, Mr. King, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Moran, Mr. Luján, Ms. Collins, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Braun, Mr. Booker, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Reed, Mr. Vance, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Schatz, and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

March 8, 2023

Reported by Mr. Menendez, without amendment


A BILL

To repeal the authorizations for use of military force against Iraq.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102–1; 105 Stat. 3; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002.

The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107–243; 116 Stat. 1498; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed.

§1541. Purpose and policy

(a) Congressional declaration

It is the purpose of this chapter to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and insure that the collective judgment of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Congressional legislative power under necessary and proper clause

Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.


Roll Call Vote 118th Congress - 1st Session


XMLVote Summary 

Question: On the Amendment (Paul Amdt No. 2 )
Vote Number: 65
Vote Date: March 22, 2023, 05:51 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5
Vote Result: Amendment Rejected
Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 2 to S. 316 (No short title on file)
Statement of Purpose: To repeal the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force.
Vote Counts:
YEAs9
NAYs
86
Not Voting
5

*Information compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate bill clerk under the direction of the secretary of the Senate

Alphabetical by Senator Name 

Baldwin (D-WI), Yea
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Bennet (D-CO), Nay
Blackburn (R-TN), Nay
Blumenthal (D-CT), Nay
Booker (D-NJ), Nay
Boozman (R-AR), Nay
Braun (R-IN), Yea
Britt (R-AL), Nay
Brown (D-OH), Nay
Budd (R-NC), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Capito (R-WV), Nay
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Casey (D-PA), Nay
Cassidy (R-LA), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Coons (D-DE), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Cortez Masto (D-NV), Nay
Cotton (R-AR), Nay
Cramer (R-ND), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
Cruz (R-TX), Nay
Daines (R-MT), Nay
Duckworth (D-IL), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Not Voting
Ernst (R-IA), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Not Voting
Fetterman (D-PA), Not Voting
Fischer (R-NE), Nay
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Hagerty (R-TN), Nay
Hassan (D-NH), Nay
Hawley (R-MO), Nay
Heinrich (D-NM), Not Voting
Hickenlooper (D-CO), Nay
Hirono (D-HI), Nay
Hoeven (R-ND), Nay
Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Nay
Johnson (R-WI), Nay
Kaine (D-VA), Nay
Kelly (D-AZ), Nay
Kennedy (R-LA), Nay
King (I-ME), Nay
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
Lankford (R-OK), Nay
Lee (R-UT), Yea
Lujan (D-NM), Nay
Lummis (R-WY), Nay
Manchin (D-WV), Nay
Markey (D-MA), Yea
Marshall (R-KS), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Not Voting
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
Merkley (D-OR), Nay
Moran (R-KS), Nay
Mullin (R-OK), Nay
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murphy (D-CT), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Ossoff (D-GA), Nay
Padilla (D-CA), Nay
Paul (R-KY), Yea
Peters (D-MI), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Ricketts (R-NE), Nay
Risch (R-ID), Nay
Romney (R-UT), Nay
Rosen (D-NV), Nay
Rounds (R-SD), Nay
Rubio (R-FL), Nay
Sanders (I-VT), Yea
Schatz (D-HI), Nay
Schmitt (R-MO), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Scott (R-FL), Nay
Scott (R-SC), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
Sinema (I-AZ), Nay
Smith (D-MN), Nay
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Sullivan (R-AK), Nay
Tester (D-MT), Nay
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Tillis (R-NC), Nay
Tuberville (R-AL), Nay
Vance (R-OH), Yea
Van Hollen (D-MD), Nay
Warner (D-VA), Nay
Warnock (D-GA), Nay
Warren (D-MA), Yea
Welch (D-VT), Nay
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
Wicker (R-MS), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Nay
Young (R-IN), Nay

 Grouped By Vote Position 

YEAs ---9
Baldwin (D-WI)
Braun (R-IN)
Cardin (D-MD)
Lee (R-UT)
Markey (D-MA)
Paul (R-KY)
Sanders (I-VT)
Vance (R-OH)
Warren (D-MA)
NAYs ---86
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blackburn (R-TN)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Booker (D-NJ)
Boozman (R-AR)
Britt (R-AL)
Brown (D-OH)
Budd (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Capito (R-WV)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Cassidy (R-LA)
Collins (R-ME)
Coons (D-DE)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Cotton (R-AR)
Cramer (R-ND)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Daines (R-MT)
Duckworth (D-IL)
Ernst (R-IA)
Fischer (R-NE)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hagerty (R-TN)
Hassan (D-NH)
Hawley (R-MO)
Hickenlooper (D-CO)
Hirono (D-HI)
Hoeven (R-ND)
Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Johnson (R-WI)
Kaine (D-VA)
Kelly (D-AZ)
Kennedy (R-LA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Lankford (R-OK)
Lujan (D-NM)
Lummis (R-WY)
Manchin (D-WV)
Marshall (R-KS)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Moran (R-KS)
Mullin (R-OK)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Ossoff (D-GA)
Padilla (D-CA)
Peters (D-MI)
Reed (D-RI)
Ricketts (R-NE)
Risch (R-ID)
Romney (R-UT)
Rosen (D-NV)
Rounds (R-SD)
Rubio (R-FL)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schmitt (R-MO)
Schumer (D-NY)
Scott (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Sinema (I-AZ)
Smith (D-MN)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Sullivan (R-AK)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)
Tuberville (R-AL)
Van Hollen (D-MD)
Warner (D-VA)
Warnock (D-GA)
Welch (D-VT)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wicker (R-MS)
Wyden (D-OR)
Young (R-IN)
Not Voting - 5
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Fetterman (D-PA)
Heinrich (D-NM)
McConnell (R-KY)

 Grouped by Home State 

Alabama:
 
Britt (R-AL), Nay
 
Tuberville (R-AL), Nay
 
Alaska:
 
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
 
Sullivan (R-AK), Nay
 
Arizona:
 
Kelly (D-AZ), Nay
 
Sinema (I-AZ), Nay
 
Arkansas:
 
Boozman (R-AR), Nay
 
Cotton (R-AR), Nay
 
California:
 
Feinstein (D-CA), Not Voting
 
Padilla (D-CA), Nay
 
Colorado:
 
Bennet (D-CO), Nay
 
Hickenlooper (D-CO), Nay
 
Connecticut:
 
Blumenthal (D-CT), Nay
 
Murphy (D-CT), Nay
 
Delaware:
 
Carper (D-DE), Nay
 
Coons (D-DE), Nay
 
Florida:
 
Rubio (R-FL), Nay
 
Scott (R-FL), Nay
 
Georgia:
 
Ossoff (D-GA), Nay
 
Warnock (D-GA), Nay
 
Hawaii:
 
Hirono (D-HI), Nay
 
Schatz (D-HI), Nay
 
Idaho:
 
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
 
Risch (R-ID), Nay
 
Illinois:
 
Duckworth (D-IL), Nay
 
Durbin (D-IL), Not Voting
 
Indiana:
 
Braun (R-IN), Yea
 
Young (R-IN), Nay
 
Iowa:
 
Ernst (R-IA), Nay
 
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
 
Kansas:
 
Marshall (R-KS), Nay
 
Moran (R-KS), Nay
 
Kentucky:
 
McConnell (R-KY), Not Voting
 
Paul (R-KY), Yea
 
Louisiana:
 
Cassidy (R-LA), Nay
 
Kennedy (R-LA), Nay
 
Maine:
 
Collins (R-ME), Nay
 
King (I-ME), Nay
 
Maryland:
 
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
 
Van Hollen (D-MD), Nay
 
Massachusetts:
 
Markey (D-MA), Yea
 
Warren (D-MA), Yea
 
Michigan:
 
Peters (D-MI), Nay
 
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
 
Minnesota:
 
Klobuchar (D-MN), Nay
 
Smith (D-MN), Nay
 
Mississippi:
 
Hyde-Smith (R-MS), Nay
 
Wicker (R-MS), Nay
 
Missouri:
 
Hawley (R-MO), Nay
 
Schmitt (R-MO), Nay
 
Montana:
 
Daines (R-MT), Nay
 
Tester (D-MT), Nay
 
Nebraska:
 
Fischer (R-NE), Nay
 
Ricketts (R-NE), Nay
 
Nevada:
 
Cortez Masto (D-NV), Nay
 
Rosen (D-NV), Nay
 
New Hampshire:
 
Hassan (D-NH), Nay
 
Shaheen (D-NH), Nay
 
New Jersey:
 
Booker (D-NJ), Nay
 
Menendez (D-NJ), Nay
 
New Mexico:
 
Heinrich (D-NM), Not Voting
 
Lujan (D-NM), Nay
 
New York:
 
Gillibrand (D-NY), Nay
 
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
 
North Carolina:
 
Budd (R-NC), Nay
 
Tillis (R-NC), Nay
 
North Dakota:
 
Cramer (R-ND), Nay
 
Hoeven (R-ND), Nay
 
Ohio:
 
Brown (D-OH), Nay
 
Vance (R-OH), Yea
 
Oklahoma:
 
Lankford (R-OK), Nay
 
Mullin (R-OK), Nay
 
Oregon:
 
Merkley (D-OR), Nay
 
Wyden (D-OR), Nay
 
Pennsylvania:
 
Casey (D-PA), Nay
 
Fetterman (D-PA), Not Voting
 
Rhode Island:
 
Reed (D-RI), Nay
 
Whitehouse (D-RI), Nay
 
South Carolina:
 
Graham (R-SC), Nay
 
Scott (R-SC), Nay
 
South Dakota:
 
Rounds (R-SD), Nay
 
Thune (R-SD), Nay
 
Tennessee:
 
Blackburn (R-TN), Nay
 
Hagerty (R-TN), Nay
 
Texas:
 
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
 
Cruz (R-TX), Nay
 
Utah:
 
Lee (R-UT), Yea
 
Romney (R-UT), Nay
 
Vermont:
 
Sanders (I-VT), Yea
 
Welch (D-VT), Nay
 
Virginia:
 
Kaine (D-VA), Nay
 
Warner (D-VA), Nay
 
Washington:
 
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
 
Murray (D-WA), Nay
 
West Virginia:
 
Capito (R-WV), Nay
 
Manchin (D-WV), Nay
 
Wisconsin:
 
Baldwin (D-WI), Yea
 
Johnson (R-WI), Nay
 
Wyoming:
 
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
 
Lummis (R-WY), Nay

Explorans Algorithmus Veritatis

 This is a journey worth exploring and I'm taking a bit of a hiatus from this blog to research some very interesting areas of Truth Seek...