Great Video to see after reading the article by Wade Stone:
Wade Stone — Global Research May 11, 2013
“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.”― Friedrich Nietzsche
Every
Spring and Summer, during a period of low pressure over the Persian
Gulf, powerful winds known as the “shamals and sharqi,” sweep down from
the north and north east into Saudi Arabia, whipping up ever more grains
of sand as they head south and south west across the Arabian Desert.
Frequently, these sandstorms become gargantuan in size – hundreds of
meters high and kilometers wide and in length of dense roiling
particulate, choking the lungs of those exposed, blocking out the sun
completely and, by the time they are over, burying whole towns,
sometimes even large cities like Riyadh, in a meter deep or more of
sand.
The wind speeds range from 30 to 300 kilometers per hour, and they generally take a semi-circular route, heading back out to the southern gulf and the remaining Gulf States. Indeed, on an annual basis all of the Gulf States combined – UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, suffer through literally hundreds of such sand and dust storms. And most often the winds driving those sandstorms originate from the north and north east (Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, and sometimes even Turkey).
Think “Fukushima x 10”: Bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities would leave the entire Gulf State region virtually uninhabitable.
Fukushima
is, without question, the world’s worst nuclear disaster to date. In
fact, many scientists believe, and with good reason, that the Fukushima
incident, which is far from over, is the world’s worst environmental catastrophe.
“While
the long-term repercussions of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster
are yet to be fully assessed, they are far more serious than those
pertaining to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, which resulted
in almost one million deaths (New Book Concludes – Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer” Global
Research, September 10, 2010. For a full account of Fukushima, see
“Global Research Online Interactive Reader Series, Fukushima: A Nuclear
War without a War, The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation
(Michel Chossudovsky, editor).
Now
imagine several large nuclear reactors (Iran’s Bushehr reactor output,
for example, is 1000 megawatts, compared to Fukushima Daiichi’s largest
reactor which had an output of 784 megawatts), along with several
uranium enrichment plants, and certainly military storage sites and
quite likely even uranium mines, all bombed to dust within a matter of
days. Moreover, unlike the Fukushima Daiichi reactors which suffered
only partial meltdowns with much of the fuel rods and spent fuel
storages remaining mostly intact, “all” of Iran’s nuclear fuel would be
exploded into the atmosphere. And let us not forget that the US-Israeli
military ordinances employed to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities would
certainly be tipped with depleted uranium, and very likely would include
some mini-nukes.
Indeed,
in regards nuclear disasters and environmental catastrophes, Fukushima
would absolutely pale in comparison to that caused by the bombing of
Iran’s nuclear sites. The nuclear fallout from such an event would be extreme,
to put it mildly. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of innocent
Iranians would likely die within the first year of such a strike, while
millions more would die within a decade or two of some form of
radiation-induced cancer. And since a significant portion of that
nuclear fallout would end up either immediately, or over the course of
the next weeks and months in the Arabian Desert, where the winds, year
after year, would gather it up along with the particles of sand and dust
into gigantic roiling irradiated storms (remember, “hundreds”
of such sand and dust storms annually), not a person living anywhere in
the Gulf State region would be safe from exposure. The Persian Gulf,
too, would soon be so irradiated and toxic and lifeless that it might as
well be renamed the New Dead Sea.
Some
statistics worth recalling: The half-life of cesium-137 is just over 31
years, while that of strontium-90 is approximately 29 years.
Plutonium-239, the most dangerous of the above-mentioned radioactive
substances, has a half-life of 24,110 years. And uranium, which is the
primary target and which will make up the largest percentage of the
fallout, has a half-life ranging between 700 million to nearly 4.5 billion years,
depending on the type of uranium used—U-235 or U-238. It’s also worth
noting that it takes an estimated 20 x the half-life years listed for
the radiation from such contamination to dissipate entirely.
Of
course, a lot of that radiation would also enter the jet stream, which
would then carry it around the globe, depositing it as nuclear fallout everywhere.
No nation, no body of water, would be spared. It takes but “one”
inhaled or ingested “hot” particle to produce a life-threatening cancer.
Calling for, even so much as contemplating, such a genocidal event is madness; actually carrying it out would be insanity beyond description.
We must
conclude, therefore, that the US-NATO-Israeli alliance is bluffing.
Shortly before each and every scheduled P5+1 negotiations regarding
Iran’s nuclear program, the corporate/government controlled mainstream
media in the West ratchets up the threats, with Israel insisting that
they will soon bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities if their nuclear program
isn’t shut down. We’ve been hearing these same threats for more than a
decade now. The very fact that the other Gulf States in the region are
in support of the US-NATO-Israeli alliance also suggests that such
threats are all smoke-and-mirrors, attempts to scare Iran into accepting
whatever demands US-NATO and Israel want.
Surely,
the Gulf State monarchs especially are aware enough to realize that,
even if Iran is planning to develop a nuclear weapon (for which no
evidence whatsoever exists), a nuclear-armed Iran would be far less of a
danger to them than a bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities, which would
positively guarantee their demise. Even Israel, which is only 1100
kilometers away from Iran, and also experiences regular severe sand and
dust storms, would likely suffer dire consequences as a result of the
radiation fallout from such an attack.
Has such absolute insanity
infected the minds of the Western powers to such a degree that they
actually would attack Iran, and in so doing destroy the entire Gulf
State region, further irradiate the entire planet and themselves, and
quite possibly set off World War III? Or is it all just
smoke-and-mirrors, scare tactics and rhetoric, and saner minds will in
fact prevail?
Let us all hope and pray for the latter
No comments:
Post a Comment