What happens when logic is used by the populace?

 Currently we are seeing the justification for routine actions taken by governments to quote "ensure our safety in the streets" What this has become no less is a loss of our individual rights.  Here is a comedic approach to the logic used for "Stop and Frisk".  What would happen if we started using the laws and policies against the people that are committing the most horrendous crimes imagined and getting away with it?  Watch American Psycho for a supposedly fictional view of what some folks can do and still walk the streets with impunity.

Here is what an astute lawmaker states:

NYPD Stop-and-Frisk Ruled Unconstitutional

Later on Monday morning, a federal judge ruled that the New York Police Department’s use of stop-and-frisk was unconstitutional, violating the rights of minorities in New York City. Judge Shira Scheindlin’s ruling is a blow to the crime fighting legacy of Mayor Michael Bloomberg and police commissioner Ray Kelly, who credit police stops with reducing major crime in the city to historic lows. But according to Scheindlin, the crime-fighting efficacy of the policy is irrelevant. “Many police practices may be useful for fighting crime…but because they are unconstitutional, they cannot be used, no matter how effective,” she wrote in her 195-page decision. She concluded that stop-and-frisk demonstrates an institutional disregard for the Fourth Amendment—which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government—as well as the Equal Protection Clause under the 14th Amendment.

4 Cases of the U.S. Sheltering Vicious Criminals that Reveal Total Hypocrisy on Snowden

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,The Daily Show on Facebook